<!DOCTYPE html>
Viscous flow is governed by conservation of mass and momentum. For steady flow, the momentum equation states that shear and pressure forces are in balance.
(6.1) |
where represents the kinematic viscosity. For incompressible flow, the mass conservation equation is:
(6.2) |
Boundary conditions specify the two components of the velocity vector on solid boundaries. For the remaining BC there are two options: either the pressure difference alon the channel can be prescribed, or the velocities at the entrance () is given. These are Dirichlet conditions in either case, however the assemble method is very different dependig on which conditios are fixed along the open voundaries.
The streamfunction and vorticity are related variables. The vorticity is the curl of the velocity field. In two dimensions
(6.3) |
The stream function satisfies:
(6.4) |
The two dimensional Poiseuille solution describes steady viscous flow in a channel with parallel wall, when the entrance velocity varies parabolically with maximum value equal to one. Taket he wall separation to be and the channel length to be , the solution is:
(6.5) |
where and , and is an arbitrary constant. In this solution the velocity is independent of , the abcissa parallel to the walls and the pressure in independent of the ordinate, . The vorticity and streamfunction ares also a functions of alone:
(6.6) |
The vorticity gradient is constant across the channel and the exists a vorticity gardient at each wall. is another arbitrary constant. The solution is illustrated in figure
This analytic solution is illustrated in figure 6.1. Profile of the velocity . the vorticity and the streamfunction , variables that are independent of are illustrated in the top frame. The pressure (independent of ) is illustrated beneath.
The weak form of equations 6.2 and 7.1 is obtained in the usual way:
(6.7) |
The pressure and the velocities are expandent in termd of trial functions. The following forms are chosen to allow the possibilty of different trial functions for velocity and pressure:
(6.8) |
(6.9) |
Introducing these expansions into equation 6.7 leads to the usual system of equations for the three dependent variables:
(6.10) |
(6.11) |
(6.12) |
Define global matrices , and with elements:
(6.13) |
(6.14) |
(6.15) |
For linear TF, the stiffness matrix is given by equation 6.16. In this case the gradient matrices are the same: and ; For the canonical triangle:
(6.16) |
In matrix form equations 6.10 through 6.12 are
(6.17) |
The zero in the lower right corner of the left lost matrix is a concern, as we will see it can cause the matrix to be singular. Fortunately this is not the case when pressure boundary conditions are imposed.
Consider the grid illustrated in figure LABEL:Fi:C4S2simplegrid. The grid has 9 nodes; there are three variables: and . the total number of variabless is of which are prescribed at the boundaries (six BC on both and and six more on ) and variables are unknown. The problem for the unknown variables is then:
(6.18) |
where is a matrix and is . The solution vector has been partitioned into , the known values at Dirichlet boundary points, and , the unknown values.
(6.19) |
If the preceeding scheme were applied to the situation where pressure is unknown everywhere, but the velocity is given on three of the four boundaries, there would be four unknown velocities (two and two ) and nine unknown . It is possible to show that if the number of unknow pressure values exceeds the total number of unknown velocities, the matrix is singular. The accepted solution is to use different order polynomials for velocity (e.g. quadratic polynomials) and for pressure (linear polynomials). This combination of trial function is called mixed TF.
To achhieve this the matrix elements in equation 6.8is , whereas matrix elements in equation LABEL:eq:C6S2:exppressi remains . Now matrices and are no longer equal. For the canonical triangle:
(6.20) |
Consider for example Poiseuille flow in a two dimensional channel, defined by four nodes (rather than nine in the example above). Velocity trial functions are taken to be quadratic polynomial and pressure trial functions are take to be linear polynomials. The pressure is determined at the four corners of the grid, whereas velocity is determined on each of the nine nodes drawn in figure 9.2
Any element has three vertices, where pressure is evaluared and a total of six nodes where the velocity is evaluated: the three vertices supplemented by three mid-point along the element boundaries.
Even with this scheme in place, the pressure is only determined to within a constant which would still cause the matrix to be singular. This problem has been encountered in Chapter 4. It can be dealt with by adding a Lagrange multiplier to the problem, as discussed in Chapter 4, section 4.3.1. The global problem can now be written
(6.21) |
In many cases it may be required to evalute the solution at some location other than a grid node.
The cylinder is embedded in a flow that extends 6 units in the -direction and four units in the -direction. The cylinder is centered on with a radius . The boundary condition set the -velocity to one along the N, W, and S boundaries, with lateral velocity set to zero. The FEM solution is illustrated in figure 7.1, where only the central portion of the computed flowfield is shown. The streamfunction shows the flow streaming by the cylinder in a pattern that is summetric about the axis. The vorticity exhibits a maximum at the bottomost part of the cylinder, where the pressure gradient driven vorticity sourge islargets. A minimum in vorticity occurs at the diametrically opposite point. The pressure is maximum at the upstream stagnation point and minimum on the dowstrem stagnation point. There is a lrge pressure gradient around the body.